Hierarchy of evidence in medical science – aspirin for colorectal cancer prevention case

Pre-requisites

Basic Understanding of Study Designs, Introduction to Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), Basic Clinical Knowledge of Colorectal Cancer (CRC), Basic Pharmacology of Aspirin

Explanation of activity

Students are divided into small groups. Each group is assigned one study from a different level in the hierarchy. Their task is to review the study and present: type of study and where it fits in the hierarchy, main finding, strengths and limitations and applicability to the clinical case.

Clinical Scenario Introduction

A 55-year-old man with a family history of colorectal cancer asks whether he should start taking low-dose aspirin to reduce his risk of developing cancer. He has no history of cardiovascular disease, gastric ulcers, or bleeding disorders.

Prompt to students: How would you approach this question using evidence-based medicine?

Discussion Questions

  • Which study provides the highest level of evidence?
  • What are the limitations of applying population-level data to an individual?
  • How do the risks (e.g., bleeding) factor into your recommendation?
  • How would you communicate this evidence to the patient?

Wrap-up: Summary and Clinical Application

  • Recap the hierarchy of evidence and how it influenced your clinical decision.
  • Discuss ongoing research needs in the field of chemoprevention.
Teacher materials

Further reading to further develop the activity/understanding of the topic:

  • Gordis Epidemiology By David D Celentano, Moyses Szklo · 2018 ISBN:9780323552318, 0323552315, October 19, 2018, Elsevier
Student Materials
Assessing and Evaluation

Learning Objectives

By the end of this session, students should be able to:

  • Understand the concept of the hierarchy of evidence in clinical research.
  • Critically appraise different types of studies (RCTs, cohort studies, meta-analyses).
  • Analyze the current evidence regarding aspirin use for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention.
  • Discuss the balance of benefits and risks in chemoprevention strategies.

Short quiz or reflective writing: Rank the provided studies by evidence level and justify. Write a 100-word recommendation note to the patient.

Modulations

Different example: psilocybin for depression treatment:

  • Response of cluster headache to psilocybin and LSD  R Andrew Sewell 1, John H Halpern, Harrison G Pope Jr, PMID: 16801660 DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219761.05466.43
  • Why psychiatry needs psychedelics and psychedelics need psychiatry Ben Sessa PMID: 24830186 DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2014.877322
  • Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression Authors: Robin Carhart-Harris, Ph.D., Bruna Giribaldi, B.Sc., Rosalind Watts, D.Clin.Psy., Michelle Baker-Jones, B.A., Ashleigh Murphy-Beiner, M.Sc., Roberta Murphy, M.D., Jonny Martell, M.D., Allan Blemings, M.Sc., David Erritzoe, M.D., and David J. Nutt, M.D. Published April 14, 2021, N Engl J Med 2021;384:1402-1411, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032994, VOL. 384 NO. 15
  • Efficacy of psilocybin for treating symptoms of depression: systematic review and meta-analysis Athina-Marina Metaxa 1, Mike Clarke, PMID: 38692686 PMCID: PMC11062320 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078084
  • Effects of psilocybin on hippocampal neurogenesis and extinction of trace fear conditioning Briony J Catlow 1, Shijie Song, Daniel A Paredes, Cheryl L Kirstein, Juan Sanchez-Ramos PMID: 23727882 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3579-0
  • Naturalistic psilocybin use is associated with persisting improvements in mental health and wellbeing: results from a prospective, longitudinal survey Sandeep M Nayak 1 2, Hillary Jackson 1 2, Nathan D Sepeda 1 2 3, David S Mathai 1 2, Sara So 1 2, Abigail Yaffe 1 2, Hadi Zaki 1 2, Trey J Brasher 4, Matthew X Lowe 4, Del R P Jolly 4, Frederick S Barrett 1 2 5 6, Roland R Griffiths 1 2 6, Justin C Strickland 1 2, Matthew W Johnson 1, Heather Jackson 4, Albert Garcia-Romeu 1 2  PMID: 37795509 PMCID: PMC10545967 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1199642
Slides

You may also like