Pre-requisites
- Basic understanding of evidence-based medicine (EBM) concepts, including:
Hierarchy of evidence (e.g., systematic reviews > RCTs > case reports). Difference between primary, secondary, and tertiary sources - Introductory skills in literature search. Familiarity with using PubMed (basic keyword and MeSH searches). Navigating institutional access to databases (e.g., via university library portal). Understanding what systematic reviews and clinical guidelines are
- Institutional access to online medical resources to PubMed or similar databases
Explanation of activity
Objective: Practice navigating trusted medical resources.
Give students the following clinical scenario:
“You are treating a 58-year-old man with new-onset atrial fibrillation. You want to know whether to use a NOAC or warfarin as first-line therapy.”
Students must answer the following questions using specific types of sources:
- Tertiary source: Find a recommendation in UpToDate or DynaMed.
- What do they recommend?
- What do they recommend?
- Secondary source: Search PubMed or Cochrane Library.
- Can you find a systematic review on this topic?
- Can you find a systematic review on this topic?
- Primary source: Locate a randomized controlled trial on this question.
- What is the key finding?
- What is the key finding?
- Guideline: Find a recent clinical guideline (e.g., ESC, ACC, NICE).
- What does it recommend?
- What does it recommend?
Deliverable: Each group fills in a simple template with:
- Source used
- Summary of recommendation or finding
- Year of publication
Teacher materials
Relevant reading to understand the materials:
Databases tutorials
PUBMED – https://learn.nlm.nih.gov/documentation/training-packets/T0042010P/
SCOPUS – https://libguides.library.arizona.edu/scopus-module1
UPTODATE – https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/uptodate/resources/user-academy
GOOGLE SCHOLAR – https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/help.html
Dawes, M., Summerskill, W., Glasziou, P. et al. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ 5, 1 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-5-1
Further reading to further develop the activity/understanding of the topic:
- Rosenfeld, R.M., Shiffman, R.N. and Robertson, P. (2013), Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual, Third Edition. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 148: S1-S55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599812467004
Resource | Best Use Case | Access Required | Strengths | Limitations |
PubMed | Finding primary studies & reviews | ❌ Free | MeSH terms, filters, high-quality | May require full-text access |
Scopus | Citation tracking, academic searching | ✅ Paid | Citation analysis, breadth | No full text, complex interface |
Google Scholar | Fast, broad search across disciplines | ❌ Free | Easy to use, wide coverage | Less filtering, includes lower-tier sources |
UpToDate | Clinical decision-making at bedside | ✅ Paid | Quick summaries, guidelines, mobile | Not detailed on methodology or raw data |
Student Materials
Cases of inappropriate reporting in media – check for true EBM answers Using https://web.archive.org/
Check links (in polish):
- https://www.planeta.pl/Ciekawostki/Koronawirus-SARS-COV-2.-Japonczycy-maja-lek-Favipiravir-skuteczny
- https://przychodnia-przemysl.pl/mozna-wyleczyc-covid-19-w-48-godzin/
- https://www.o2.pl/artykul/koronawirus-nowe-badania-wykazuja-ze-palacze-sa-mniej-narazeni-na-covid-19-6502927061780609a
Reliable sources of medical knowledge
Medical literature databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Google Scholar, etc.)
UpToDate
Assessing and Evaluation
By the end of this session, students will be able to:
- Differentiate between primary, secondary, and tertiary sources of medical knowledge.
- Identify reliable databases and resources for evidence-based information.
- Critically assess the credibility of online medical content.
- Understand the role of clinical guidelines and systematic reviews in decision-making.
Criterion | Excellent (5) | Good (4) | Adequate (3) | Needs Improvement (1–2) |
Correct use of source types | All sources correctly classified and used appropriately | Minor errors | Some confusion | Mostly incorrect |
Citation & Navigation Skills | Correct citations, used filters, advanced search | Minor citation issues | Incomplete or generic search | Missing or unreliable sources |
Critical Thinking | Clear rationale for source choice; compared alternatives | Some rationale | Limited explanation | Lacks justification |
Team Collaboration (if group work) | Clear roles, shared effort | Uneven participation | One person dominated | Minimal teamwork |
Post-Exercise Quiz
Which source provides filtered, expert-summarized clinical recommendations?
a) UpToDate ✔️
b) PubMed
c) Google Scholar
d) Wikipedia
Which of the following is considered a secondary source?
a) Systematic Review ✔️
b) Case Report
c) Editorial
d) Guideline
You find a 2003 article cited in UpToDate. What should you do?
a) Use it blindly
b) Ignore it
c) Check for more recent evidence ✔️
d) Email the author
You may also like
June 11, 2025